Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8077959 | Energy | 2014 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
The current paper aims to present an approach to quantify monetised environmental benefits related to reductions in air pollutant emissions in this context. The tool EcoSenseWeb is applied to the case of a DeNOx retrofit at a coal-fired power plant hypothetically located at three different sites in Europe, varying in terms of environmental conditions. Following environmental cost-benefit analysis principles, the DeNOx investment proves to be socially efficient at all sites. Costs tend to be disproportionate under certain conditions, e.g. lower operating hours per year and remote geographic locations, justifying case-specific derogations. The applicability of the methodology and the related tool in the process of granting derogations under the IED is explored, while noting practical and methodological limitations. Associated development needs are highlighted, at best to be addressed at EU (European Union) level in a harmonised way.
Keywords
TEQTSAPWITHImpact pathway approachIPAMDCNMVOCCBAemission limit valueBATdeNOxIEDGHGIPPCEuropean UnionELVIndustrial emissionwithoutBest Available TechniqueCost-benefit analysisIndustrial Emissions DirectiveToxic equivalentMACExternal costMarginal abatement costCaféSelective catalytic reductionGreenhouse gasSCR
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy (General)
Authors
Till M. Bachmann, Jonathan van der Kamp,