Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8129006 Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 2016 26 Pages PDF
Abstract
The results also indicate the higher performance of proposed method over the conventional uncertainty assessment methods to predict the most likely recovery factor. The prediction error of most likely recovery factor by applying GA, BBD, FFD, CCD, UD, and RVF is 0.11, 2.2, 3.15, 2.78, 7.22, and 11.4% respectively.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences (General)
Authors
, ,