Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8129006 | Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering | 2016 | 26 Pages |
Abstract
The results also indicate the higher performance of proposed method over the conventional uncertainty assessment methods to predict the most likely recovery factor. The prediction error of most likely recovery factor by applying GA, BBD, FFD, CCD, UD, and RVF is 0.11, 2.2, 3.15, 2.78, 7.22, and 11.4% respectively.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Earth and Planetary Sciences (General)
Authors
Meysam Naderi, Ehsan Khamehchi,