| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8131597 | Advances in Space Research | 2018 | 34 Pages | 
Abstract
												The cross-validation proves the good consistency between PLRM and SAR sea level anomaly in the coastal zone. The regional ocean model (BSH) shows the highest agreement with the SAR sea level anomaly, with a standard deviation of the differences (stdd) of 24â¯cm, whereas the corresponding value with respect to PLRM is 55â¯cm. Distance to coast plots show that land contamination begins to affect sea level and wave measurements at 2â¯km from the coast in SAR and at 3.5â¯km in PLRM TALES. The analysis of monthly mean time-series shows that SAR Altimetry is able to measure the sea level monthly mean in the coastal zone of the region of interest, during the entire mission, more precisely than PLRM. The cross-validation against in situ data also proves the higher accuracy of SAR SAMOSA+ compared to PLRM TALES in the coastal zone, with average SLA stdd of 4.4â¯cm and 8.4â¯cm respectively.
											Related Topics
												
													Physical Sciences and Engineering
													Earth and Planetary Sciences
													Space and Planetary Science
												
											Authors
												Salvatore Dinardo, Luciana Fenoglio-Marc, Christopher Buchhaupt, Matthias Becker, Remko Scharroo, M. Joana Fernandes, Jérôme Benveniste, 
											