| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8159505 | Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 2013 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
⺠Four stray field methods are compared in terms of accuracy and storage requirements. ⺠The demagnetizing tensor method is the most accurate for cuboid-like samples. ⺠FES performs best for curved structures. ⺠In terms of storage and complexity the tensor structured method scales below linear.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Condensed Matter Physics
Authors
Claas Abert, Lukas Exl, Gunnar Selke, André Drews, Thomas Schrefl,