Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8201128 | Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy | 2018 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
The results indicate that the OAR doses assessed by DVH criteria were higher than ICRU point doses for the bladder with both tandem-ovoid and tandem-ring applicators whereas DVH based dose was lower than ICRU dose for the rectum. The point B dose, the treated volume and high dose volume was found to be slightly higher with the tandem-ovoid applicator. The mean D2cc dose for the bladder and rectum was lower with tandem-ring applicators. The clinical implication of the above dosimetric differences needs to be evaluated further.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Authors
Ramya Rangarajan,