| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8223608 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2013 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
VMAT and HT provided very similar and highly conformal plans that complied well with OAR dose-volume constraints. Although some dosimetric differences were statistically significant, they remained small. HT provided a more homogeneous dose distribution, whereas VMAT enabled a shorter delivery time.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
David MD, PhD, Fabrice PhD, Thomas PhD, Claire PhD, Emmanuelle MSc, Eric MD, PhD,