Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8228551 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2011 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The high specificity and positive predictive value for the evaluation of tumor response with PET2 and PET3 might avoid unnecessary salvage surgery in patients with a CR. In contrast to PET3, the sensitivity of PET 2 was low, and the difference in OS between the CR and NCR groups was not significantly different. Therefore, the evaluation of the tumor response with FDG-PET at 4 months after RT completion cannot be replaced by FDG-PET during RT at 47 Gy.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Gaëtane M.D., Mia M.D., Ashraf M.D., Douwe M.D., Guy Ph.D., Hendrik Ph.D.,