Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8229686 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2011 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The rate of errors in RT delivery is low. The types of errors differ significantly between IMRT and 3D/conventional RT, suggesting that QA processes must be uniquely adapted for each technique. There was a lower error rate with IMRT compared with 3D/conventional RT, highlighting the need for sustained vigilance against errors common to more traditional treatment techniques.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Danielle N. M.D. M.P.H., Yu-Hui M.S., M.P.H., Paul J. Sc.D., Kenneth B.S.N., Todd R.T.T., Kristopher R.T.T., Luciant D. M.S., Robert A. Ph.D., Peter M.D., Andrea K. M.D., M.P.H.,