Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8238622 International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 2008 10 Pages PDF
Abstract
The differences between 2D and 3D alignments were mainly caused by the relative flexibility of certain H&N structures and possibly by rotation. Better immobilization of the flexible neck is required to further reduce the setup errors for H&N patients receiving radiotherapy.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Physics and Astronomy Radiation
Preview
Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , ,