Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8242579 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2007 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Conclusion: Clinical target volume delineation based on a 2-cm margin rather than on peritumoral edema did not seem to alter the central pattern of failure for patients with GBM. For patients with peritumoral edema >75 cm3, using a constant 2-cm margin resulted in a smaller median percent volume of brain being irradiated to 30 Gy, 46 Gy, and 50 Gy compared with corresponding theoretical RTOG plans that deliberately included peritumoral edema.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Eric L. M.D., Serap M.D., Tedde C.M.D., Neal C.M.D., Chris C.M.D., John C.M.D., Robin M.B.A., C.M.D., Pamela K. Ph.D., K.S. Clifford M.D., Anita M.D., Shiao Y. M.D., Moshe H. M.D.,