Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8245278 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2006 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Conclusion: Reported bF results vary not only because of bF definition differences, but because of variations in how those definitions are written into computer-based calculators, with multiple interpretations most prevalent for the ACD. An algorithm to avoid misinterpretations is proposed for the L2 definition. A verification system to guarantee consistent electronic bF results requires development.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Scott G. F.R.A.N.Z.C.R., Tom M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Larry M.D., Louis M.D., Paul M.Sc., Ryan M.Sc., Gary F.R.A.N.Z.C.R.,