Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8247129 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2006 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Conclusion: Over the years, our AUR rate has fallen significantly (from 17% to 6.3%). On multivariate analysis, highly significant factors include IPSS, PUTV, CT:PUTV ratio (i.e., degree of prostate edema), and order of implant (learning curve). Over the course of the program, we have deliberately reduced the number of needles and OR time per patient, which have potentially minimized intraoperative trauma and may have contributed to less toxicity. A learning curve in prostate brachytherapy programs affect not only the outcome but also the toxicity from the treatment.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Mira (F.R.C.P.C.), Devin M.D., Veronika M.Sc., Michael (F.R.C.P.C.), Alexander (F.R.C.P.C.), Tom (F.R.C.P.C.), Jonn (F.R.C.P.C.), Mitchell (F.R.C.P.C.), Joseph (F.R.A.C.P., F.R.A.N.Z.A.R.), W. James (F.R.C.P.C.),