Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8247383 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2006 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Conclusions: The difference in NTID between 3DCRT and IMRT is small. The 20 MV plans somewhat reduced NTID compared with 6 MV plans. The advantage of tomotherapy over conventional IMRT and 3DCRT for localized prostate cancer was demonstrated in regard to dose sparing of rectal wall and penile bulb while slightly decreasing NTID as compared with 6MV-3DCRT.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Hidefumi M.D., Ph.D., David Clark B.S., Thomas Rockwell Ph.D., Gustavo H. Ph.D., Søren M. Ph.D., Rakesh R. M.D., Ph.D., Hazim Ph.D., Wolfgang A. Ph.D., Mark A. M.D., Ph.D., Minesh P. M.D.,