| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8249072 | Physica Medica | 2018 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
In the phantom setting, both techniques demonstrated a significant correlation to the true bifurcation angle. Despite the lack of agreement of the two techniques in the clinical context, our findings in phantoms suggest that MPR should be preferred to VRT for the measurement of coronary bifurcation angle by CCTA.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Sogol Givehchi, Mohammad Javad Safari, Sock Keow Tan, Mohammad Nazri Bin Md Shah, Fadhli Bin Mohamed Sani, Raja Rizal Azman, Zhonghua Sun, Chai Hong Yeong, Kwan Hoong Ng, Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong,