Valorization of co-combustion fly ash in concrete production

•Co-combustion and coal fly ashes partially replace cement (substitution ratio 20%).•CCFA has a higher unburned carbon content and slightly lower fineness than CFA.•CCFA and CFA have a beneficial effect on concrete workability when used as SCM.•CCFA use decreases slightly concrete compressive strength and durability.

The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects of two different Supplementary Cementing Materials (SCMs) on mechanical and durability-related properties of structural concrete. Three mixes were produced, where coal and co-combustion fly ashes were used as partial substitute of cement (20% in volume) and compared with a control/reference concrete. Performances investigated included fresh concrete properties, compressive and tensile strength, elastic modulus, permeability, capillarity and drying/wetting resistance. Results indicate that both the SCMs can be classified as low-carbon fly ashes, and their use in concrete improves the workability of the mixes. A slight reduction of mechanical strength was observed for the concretes including both the SCMs. In addition, concrete transport properties were also slightly reduced when co-combustion fly ash was used. Wetting-drying cycles affected significantly the durability of all the mixes: compressive strength after these cycles was significantly lowered, and the cracks occurred due to the thermal stress applied, appeared to be filled by needle-shape crystals of ettringite.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide