Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8454845 | Lung Cancer | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Three predictors for false-negative outcomes were identified: central location of the lung tumor (OR 3.7/4.5/3.6 for EBUS, EUS and EUS/EBUS respectively, p < 0.05), nodal enlargement on CT (OR 3.2/2.5/4.9 for EBUS, EUS and EUS/EBUS respectively, p < 0.05) and FDG-avidity of N2/N3 lymph node stations on PET (OR 4.2/4.0/7.5 for EBUS, EUS and EUS/EBUS respectively, p < 0.05). One subgroup (peripheral lung tumor, nodal enlargement on CT without FDG-avidity for N2/N3) had a low predicted probability (7.8%) for false-negative EUS. For combined EUS/EBUS, two subgroups were identified: peripheral located tumor with nodal enlargement on CT but without FDG-avidity for N2/N3 (predicted probability 4.7%) and centrally located tumor without affected lymph nodes on CT or PET (predicted probability 3.4%). In conclusion, for specific well-defined subsets of NSCLC patients the low predicted probability of metastasis after negative endosonography might justify omitting confirmatory surgical staging.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Cancer Research
Authors
Mehrdad Talebian Yazdi, Joost Egberts, Mink S. Schinkelshoek, Ron Wolterbeek, Johannes Nabers, Ben J.W. Venmans, Kurt G. Tournoy, Jouke T. Annema,