Interprofessional education in pediatrics-Child protection and family services as a teaching example

All conducted courses over five consecutive terms were evaluated with an arithmetic mean of AM = 1.32 on a 6-point scale (1 = “excellent”, 6 = “insufficient”), the teaching tandem was evaluated with AM = 1.1. All participants (N = 85 complete evaluations) voted for the course to be continued in the following terms. Especially the opportunity to discuss cases with students from different degree programs was highly valued as were interprofessional discussions and more in-depth understanding of other professions' competencies and roles.