Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8624753 Bone 2018 34 Pages PDF
Abstract
For total BMC, as much as 80% of the variation during the first year of GH treatment could be explained by proteomic biomarkers, body fat, nutrition and bone formation markers, whereas for height-adjusted BMC 57% could be explained. The inclusion of information about either body composition (fat/lean mass) or nutritional markers contributed with approximately 20%. The variation in heightSDS gain could be explained to 75%. Hence, information of fat or nutrition markers was needed for explaining the variation in bone acquisition to the same magnitude as explaining the variation in height response.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Developmental Biology
Authors
, , , , ,