Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8624800 | Bone | 2018 | 33 Pages |
Abstract
Low EA achieved through dietary energy restriction resulted in a significant decrease in bone formation but no change in bone resorption, whereas low EA achieved through exercise energy expenditure did not significantly influence bone metabolism. Both low EA conditions elicited significant and similar changes in hormone concentrations.
Keywords
Peak aerobic capacityBMDACALBMIGF-1pTHDXAVO2 peakP1NPIPAQECLIAβ-CTxAUCPO4EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidstandard deviationconanalysis of varianceANOVABone mineral densityTriiodothyronineEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayELISALean body massdual energy X-ray absorptiometrybaselineEnergy availabilityDAYbody mass indexBMICoefficient of Variationinsulin-like growth factor 1PhosphateBone metabolismMetabolic equivalentMETarea under the curveMagnesiumparathyroid hormoneBaseInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Developmental Biology
Authors
Maria Papageorgiou, Daniel Martin, Hannah Colgan, Simon Cooper, Julie P. Greeves, Jonathan C.Y. Tang, William D. Fraser, Kirsty J. Elliott-Sale, Craig Sale,