Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8662763 | International Journal of Cardiology | 2018 | 26 Pages |
Abstract
Our study shows that TEVAR may be favorable in long-term outcomes and effectively provide morphologic advantages compared to BMT. However, there is a need for prophylactic measures against stroke in TEVAR. OS seems to be inferior to TEVAR both in short-term and long-term outcomes. Further studies especially randomized clinical trials are needed to comprehensively compare the efficacy between TEVAR and BMT.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Fu-Rong Li, Xiaoxiang Wu, Jinqiu Yuan, Jiangyun Wang, Chen Mao, Xianbo Wu,