| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8671405 | Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Our data confirm proposed potential benefits attributable to the minimally invasive nature of pEVAR while demonstrating cost-effectiveness despite the additional cost of closure devices. Taking into account pEVAR failures still does not increase pEVAR costs over cEVAR. Further considering reduced postoperative pain and wound complications, the technique deserves consideration in suitable patients.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Miriam Elisabeth MD, Corinna MD, Fadi MD, Markus MD, Jürgen MD, Afshin MD,