Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8674490 | Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases | 2018 | 21 Pages |
Abstract
In this viewpoint, we critically appraise these pharmacovigilance data on SGLT2-Is, with the aim of supporting clinicians in proper interpretation of these studies, and discussing their risk-benefit profile. To this aim, we offer a broad perspective on basic technical aspects subtending DAs of spontaneous reporting databases (describing peculiarities of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System), their common and evolving uses, key pitfalls in presenting study results (in terms of “risk” or “association”) and relevant strategies to account for major confounders. This will also facilitate reviewers and editors in proper evaluation of DAs, and prompt pharmacovigilance experts in converging towards a set of minimum requirements in standardization of design, performance and reporting of DAs. A consensus on quality assessment of DAs will finally establish their transferability to clinical practice. It is anticipated that DAs cannot be used per se as a standalone approach to assess a drug-related risk and cannot replace clinical judgment in the individual patient.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
E. Raschi, E. Poluzzi, F. Salvo, A. Pariente, F. De Ponti, G. Marchesini, U. Moretti,