| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8719285 | Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma | 2017 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Emergency Medicine
Authors
Mallikarjun Honnenahalli Chandrappa, Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh,