Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8733185 | Health Policy and Technology | 2017 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Stakeholders need to agree on a mutually acceptable, consistent method to guide regulatory decisions. The lack of consensus regarding the purpose and performance of clinical evaluation of EHRs could impact negatively on a safe and efficient documentation in healthcare. Thus, there is a need for more consistent use of terms and concepts in, and a more systematic approach to, clinical evaluation of EHRs. To ensure that the implementation of IT in healthcare meets expectations, delivers the desired outcome, and does not create new problems, it should be evaluated.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Health Informatics
Authors
Lisa Ericson, Tora Hammar, Nils Schönström, Göran Petersson,