Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8736635 | Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology | 2016 | 18 Pages |
Abstract
Choosing the most fit-for-purpose outcome measurement instruments is fundamental because using inappropriate instruments can lead to detection bias and measurement inconsistency. Recent recommendations, consensus procedures and systematic reviews on existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) informed this manuscript, which provides suggestions on which outcome domains and measurement instruments to use in patients with low back pain (LBP). Six domains are identified as highly relevant: (1) physical functioning, (2) pain intensity, (3) health-related quality of life, (4) work, (5) psychological functioning and (6) pain interference. For each domain, one or more PROMs are suggested for clinical research and practice, selecting among those that are most frequently used and recommended, and that have satisfactory measurement properties in patients with LBP. Further research on the measurement properties of these suggested PROMs is needed while also considering other emerging instruments, such as the PROMIS computerised adaptive testing and short forms.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
Authors
Alessandro Chiarotto, Caroline B. Terwee, Raymond W. Ostelo,