Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8755412 | Auris Nasus Larynx | 2014 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
In the present study, the risk factors for recurrent epistaxis were unidentified bleeding point. Thus, it is important to identify and cauterize a bleeding point to prevent recurrent epistaxis. The present results also suggest the effectiveness of electrocautery and the higher rate of recurrent epistaxis for patients who underwent gauze packing as initial treatment for posterior bleeding. Electrocautery should be the first-choice treatment of otolaryngologists for all bleeding points of epistaxis, and painful gauze packing may be inadvisable for posterior bleeding. More cases of posterior bleeding are needed for future studies involving multivariate analyses and appropriate analyses of factors related to hospitalization, surgery, and embolization.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Yuji Ando, Jiro Iimura, Satoshi Arai, Chiaki Arai, Manabu Komori, Matsusato Tsuyumu, Takanori Hama, Yasushi Shigeta, Atsushi Hatano, Hiroshi Moriyama,