| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8766744 | Progrès en Urologie | 2017 | 19 Pages | 
Abstract
												The strength of evidence is based almost entirely on retrospective studies and is susceptible to the inherent limitations of this study design. Although, the evidence was low among studies, our revue showed that, in elderly patients treated with ablative therapy for cT1a tumors, the cancer-specific survival was comparable to partial nephrectomy with differences in overall survival that are explained by competing risks of death in the old population. Considering the functional results, the renal function preservation seems to be comparable between the 2 groups while the perioperative morbidity is higher in the partial nephrectomy group. The evidence base medicine at this time cannot support the extension of the indications of ablative therapy beyond the actual implementations.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Medicine and Dentistry (General)
												
											Authors
												P. Mouracade, T. Tricard, A. Gangi, X. Cathelineau, H. Lang, 
											