Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8776427 | Urology | 2017 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
Delaying primary bladder closure for patients with small polypoid bladder templates did not affect closure or continence outcomes. However, primary and secondary polyps may require different surgical interventions. Bladder neck reconstruction was markedly less successful in secondary polyp patients, and secondary polyp patients were more likely to need augmentation to increase bladder capacity. This study emphasizes the importance of a successful primary closure and suggests that secondary polyps are an indicator of decreasing potential for bladder growth.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
John Jayman, Ali Tourchi, Mahsa Shabaninia, Mahir Maruf, Heather DiCarlo, John P. Gearhart,