| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8776831 | The Breast | 2018 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Interval breast cancer rate amongst screening participants in the STORM trial was marginally lower (and screening sensitivity higher) than estimates amongst 2D-screened women; these findings should be interpreted with caution given the small number of interval cases and the sample size of the trial. Much larger screening studies, or pooled analyses, are required to examine interval cancer rates arising after breast tomosynthesis screening versus digital mammography screening.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health
Authors
Nehmat Houssami, Daniela Bernardi, Francesca Caumo, Silvia Brunelli, Carmine Fantò, Marvi Valentini, Giovanna Romanucci, Maria A. Gentilini, Manuel Zorzi, Petra Macaskill,