Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8796223 | Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery | 2018 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
The debate between arthroscopic Bankart repair versus the Latarjet technique for patients with anterior shoulder instability largely hinges on the argument between redislocation rate versus complication rate. This difference becomes more apparent when considering patients with bone loss. We believe that Bankart “plus” techniques, including arthroscopic anatomic bone grafting, create a stable shoulder with a low instability recurrence rate, while maintaining a complication rate comparable to the Bankart repair.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Erin E. M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Ivan Ho-bun M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Dip Sports Medicine, M.A.C.M.,