Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8804438 | The Spine Journal | 2018 | 19 Pages |
Abstract
Both groups had similar clinical and radiographic outcomes. Extension of a posterior cervical fusion into the thoracic spine leads to lower pseudarthrosis rate, whereas stopping in the cervical spine yields lower EBL, OR time, and LOS, demonstrating that there are different benefits for each approach. However, although the optimal end-level remains debatable, there are scenarios in which upper thoracic extension should be considered. At this point, we recommend extension of surgery in smokers and other patients at increased risk for pseudarthrosis as well as in patients with anatomical limitations to strong C7 bone anchorage.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Eeric MD, Devender PhD, Matthew J. MD, John K. MD,