| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8811854 | Journal of Pediatric Urology | 2017 | 19 Pages |
Abstract
Stomal stenosis remains a frustrating complication following creation of the MACE stoma. In the present series, neither a cecal wall flap, nor the stomal site location contributed to SS. Obesity was the only identified statistically significant risk factor that led to SS.Summary Table. Stomal stenosis risk analysis.Stomal compositionPatent MACEStenosed MACEStomal locationPatentStenosedAppendix119RLQ1211Cecal flap88Umbilical88Ileocecostomy12Odds ratio1.09Odds ratioa1.22P-value0.89P-value0.77Confidence interval0.30-3.91Confidence interval0.32-4.57Pre-operative weightPatentStenosedPre-operative weightPatentStenosedNormal169Normal138Obese410Overweight711Odds ratio4.44Odds ratio2.55P-value0.04P-value0.16Confidence interval1.08-18.36Confidence interval0.70-9.31MACE, Malone antegrade continence enema; RLQ, right lower quadrant.aComparing the standard (appendiceal) MACE to the cecal flap.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health
Authors
A.J. Rensing, J.F. Koenig, P.F. Austin,