Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
881423 Journal of Adolescence 2006 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

PurposeTo examine concordance between two self-reported measures of puberty: Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS) and Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) and their acceptability to adolescents.MethodsParticipants of a school-based study in grades 5, 7 and 9 were classified into one of 5 pubertal stages using each method.Results2864 students (age 9–16 years) participated. Agreement was moderate for males (κκ 0.42, 95% CI 0.39, 0.45) and females (κκ 0.57, 95% CI 0.53, 0.61). Concordance within one stage was excellent (females 97%, males 89%), with discrepancies due to females being classified one stage later on the PDS (26%) and males one stage earlier (32%). There were more missing data for the SMS (13%) than the PDS (4%).ConclusionsGiven the level of concordance and difficulties of using the drawings in a school-based survey, we would recommend the PDS as an alternative to assess pubertal status in epidemiological studies.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
, , , , , , , ,