Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
881716 Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2014 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Increasing learner motivation with incentives enhanced overall learning.•Increasing motivation did not modulate benefit of retrieval practice.•Advantage of retrieval practice not due to lower engagement or attention in rereading control.•Retrieval practice yields better learning than rereading regardless of motivation.

Retrieval practice tends to produce better long-term learning than rereading, but laboratory studies have typically used arbitrary material that subjects may not care to learn. The observed advantage of retrieval practice may be exaggerated because low motivation may result in deficient processing during (usually passive) rereading. Thus, when subjects are motivated to learn the material, the type of study strategy (whether retrieval practice or rereading) might be less important. To test this hypothesis, we conducted 3 experiments in which we manipulated the incentives (using monetary bonuses or time savings) for learning Swahili–English word pairs. Items that had undergone retrieval practice were better recalled than reread items on a final test 2 days later, but this effect did not interact with incentive level. These results provide some reassurance that lab findings from the testing effects literature likely generalize to real-world situations in which motivation to learn may be greater.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Psychology Applied Psychology
Authors
, ,