Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8817895 | Health Policy | 2018 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
We contend that differences in reform outcomes stem from the medical profession's reaction to government's endeavors. This response, in turn, hinges on the professional organizations' relative institutional position vis-a-vis state authorities. This study constitutes a unique investigation of the medical profession's response to critical quality measurement reforms. Most importantly, it stresses the institutional position of medical associations as the primary factor in explaining cross-case variation in government's success in introducing quality measurement.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Baruch Levi, Amos Zehavi, David Chinitz,