Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8819599 | Journal of Cystic Fibrosis | 2018 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
The evidence suggested that (i) all screening strategies are cost-effective as compared to the no-screening option and (ii) IRT-PAP seems to be the most cost-effective screening strategy towards CFNBS. Methodological and contextual differences of the individual studies make it difficult to derive strong conclusions from this evidence. Nevertheless, from a health-economic perspective, IRT-PAP should be included as an alternative when deciding on the screening strategy in the implementation of CFNBS.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Authors
Masja Schmidt, Amber Werbrouck, Nick Verhaeghe, Elke De Wachter, Steven Simoens, Lieven Annemans, Koen Putman,