Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8822996 Journal of the American College of Radiology 2018 8 Pages PDF
Abstract
Our experience supports the implementation of nonrandom peer review as a replacement to random peer review, with nonrandom peer review serving as a more effective method for collecting diagnostic error cases with educational and quality improvement value.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Radiology and Imaging
Preview
Random Versus Nonrandom Peer Review: A Case for More Meaningful Peer Review
Authors
, , , ,