Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
883084 | Journal of Criminal Justice | 2010 | 11 Pages |
PurposeMost research on school-based adolescent sexual victimization has lacked an explicit theoretical focus. This study examined whether an opportunity framework is appropriate for understanding adolescent school-based sexual harassment and sexual assault victimization using gender-specific multilevel analysis.MethodsUsing a sample of middle and high school adolescents, we examined the effects of individual-level indicators of opportunity on school-based sexual harassment and sexual assault victimization. In addition, we explored the relative influence of school factors on student sexual victimization, including the potential moderating influence the school environment may have on the effects of individual-level indicators of opportunity. Finally, we examined the potential differences in the correlates of sexual victimization across male and female adolescents.ResultsSeveral individual-level indicators of opportunity were associated with school-based sexual harassment and sexual assault for both males and females, though several important gender differences were observed. In addition, school factors directly and indirectly influenced sexual victimization.ConclusionsFindings suggest that an opportunity framework is appropriate for understanding school-based sexual harassment and sexual assault victimization, and that important gender differences do exist. The implications of these results and directions for future research are discussed.
Research Highlights►Individual-level indicators of opportunity are correlated with adolescent school-based sexual harassment and sexual assault victimization. ►Not only do school factors influence school-based victimization risk directly, they also indirectly influence it by moderating the effects of individual-level indicators of opportunity. ►Though opportunity variables are correlated with sexual victimization risk for both male and female adolescents, there are several important gender differences, indicating that perceived opportunity for victimization does not operate uniformly across gender.