| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 883364 | Journal of Criminal Justice | 2008 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The current study extended prior citation analyses in criminology and criminal justice by drawing upon an alternative, non-published source for inquiry—reading lists provided to PhD students to aid in their preparation for criminological theory doctoral examinations. Reading lists were analyzed and the most-cited scholars were identified using various measures. The strengths and weaknesses of this methodological approach as well as implications are discussed.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Applied Psychology
Authors
Matthew J. Giblin, Joseph A. Schafer,