Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8836646 | Surgery | 2018 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
In low-risk patients, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement results in similar mortality, stroke, reoperation rates for bleeding, and midterm survival (after adjusting for confounders), but shorter hospital length of stay and a trend (Pâ¯=â¯.075) toward shorter intensive care unit stay, compared to full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Therefore, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement should stand as a benchmark against transcatheter aortic valve replacement in these patients.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Surgery
Authors
Sameer A. MD, Masaki MD, Jiyae BS, Fernando MD, MPH, Ahmed A. MD, Siobhan BS, Marc P. MD, MSc, Sary MD, Prem S. MD, Tsuyoshi MD,