Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
884007 | Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization | 2011 | 16 Pages |
I develop a model of the market for news in which consumers and reporters both ideologically misinterpret information and have biased beliefs about the extent to which others misinterpret information. I show that for some parameter values, in equilibrium: (i) a monopolist media outlet hires a politically moderate reporter but duopolist outlets use relatively extreme, differentiated reporters; (ii) in duopoly, consumers think of their preferred outlet's news reporter as relatively unbiased and the other outlet's reporter as relatively biased; (iii) consumers, in the aggregate, may be less informed in duopoly than monopoly, despite more consumers receiving news in duopoly.
Research highlights► I model the news market assuming consumers and reporters have ideological biases. ► All agents also have biased beliefs about the ideological biases. ► In the model, consumers desire unbiased news but disagree on media bias. ► The model implies increasing competition may reduce consumers information. ► This occurs despite increasing competition causing more consumers to receive news.