Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
884112 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2011 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

Economics implicitly assumes that the marginal utility of income is independent of an individual's personality. We show that this is wrong. This is the first demonstration that there are strong personality–income interactions. In an analysis of 13,615 individuals over 4-years we show that individuals who have high levels of conscientiousness obtain more satisfaction to their lives from increases to their household income. There are strong gender differences and women that are open-to-experiences, introverted or neurotic get lower satisfaction from household income increases. Our findings have important implications for the use of financial incentives to influence behavior. In the future, public policy may benefit from being personality-specific.

Research highlights► We examine whether the influence of income on life satisfaction is dependent on personality. ► Conscientious men and women obtain more life satisfaction from household income increases. ► Openness-to-experiences, extroversion and neuroticism moderate the relationship for women. ► Our findings pose questions on the use of financial incentives to change behavior.

Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics and Econometrics
Authors
, ,