Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
884561 | Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization | 2006 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
In an article published in this journal, Rapoport and Amaldoss [Rapoport, A., Amaldoss, W., 2000. Mixed strategies and iterative elimination of strongly dominated strategies: an experimental investigation of states of knowledge. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 42, 483–521] analyze symmetric and asymmetric investment games similar to two-player all-pay auctions with bid caps. In this note, we correct an error in their characterization of the set of Nash equilibria of their symmetric investment game. We discuss the implications for the analysis of data from Rapoport and Amaldoss's experiments.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Emmanuel Dechenaux, Dan Kovenock, Volodymyr Lugovskyy,