Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8864201 | Atmospheric Environment | 2018 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The POM measured ozone accurately compared to the 49i ozone monitor, with average relative differences of less than 8%. In the controlled environment tests, the POM's ozone measurements did not change in the presence of additional atmospheric constituents with similar absorption lines to ozone, though there may have been a small decrease in precision and accuracy. Precision between POMs varied by environment (r2Â =Â 0.98 outdoors; r2Â =Â 0.3 to 0.9 in controlled lab conditions). Volunteers reported that the POM was reasonably comfortable to wear, although all reported that they felt that it was too noisy. Overall, the POM is a viable option for personal ozone monitoring.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Atmospheric Science
Authors
Jessica A. Sagona, Clifford P. Weisel, Qingyu Meng,