Impact of the hybrid gain ensemble data assimilation on meso-scale numerical weather prediction over east China

The results of single observation tests showed that the analysis increments of HGDA retained more characteristics of the EnKF than HCDA because of utilizing the EnKF analysis ensemble mean in the re-center step. Both the hybrid data assimilation methods showed superiority over the pure EnKF and 3DVar in full cycling experiments. The average RMSE of HGDA was slightly smaller than the HCDA. It was also found that the HGDA method showed its advantage over HCDA at shorter leading time and yielded the highest precipitation score. For rainfall field, the HGDA had the best results in terms of intensity and coverage. Furthermore, the HGDA showed better results for supplying sufficient moisture conditions over rainfall area, such as precipitable water and water vapor flux. The uplift vertical velocity that contributed to the improvement of precipitation simulation was also strengthened. In general, both of the hybrid data assimilation methods showed better results than EnKF and 3DVar. Especially, the HGDA method showed advantage benefiting from the utilization of optimal EnKF analysis mean and 3DVar analysis which equals to the linearly combination of the gain matrix, considering the total error variance.