Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8866009 Journal of Geochemical Exploration 2018 57 Pages PDF
Abstract
On a plot of Cr2O3 versus TiO2, MIC chromites plot within the field of komatiites, whereas on plots of Cr# versus Mg# the chromites plot in the stratiform field. However, on both TiO2 (wt%) and Al2O3 (wt%) versus Cr2O3 (wt%) plots, MIC samples fall within the fields of podiform chromites. The high Cr# of MIC chromite cores suggest arc affinities based on their inferred Al2O3-TiO2 contents of parental melts to the chromites. It is therefore proposed that MIC formed at a convergent boundary and was later accreted to its present position at the margin of the MGSB, or formed entirely due to subduction processes, which may also have formed this part of the MGSB. The ferritchromite rims likely formed during subsequent metamorphism under at least greenschist facies metamorphism, which likely also resulted in the formation of chrysotile asbestos.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences Economic Geology
Authors
,