Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8867443 | Global and Planetary Change | 2018 | 64 Pages |
Abstract
The ERA-Interim and NCEP2 reanalyses represent climate extremes with different success. ERA-Interim can recognize temperature extremes in time and space, while the older NCEP2 presents systematic positive errors and has some difficult to replicate the interannual variability of the number of summer days. Both reanalyses reproduce dry spells and the annual maximum 5-day precipitation with large biases, which are particularly noticeable at each observation station. Although reanalyses would be expected to add information for climate extremes in areas of scarce observations like northeastern Argentina, they still need to be used with great caution and only as a complement to observations, especially in studies focusing on precipitation extremes.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Earth-Surface Processes
Authors
Miguel A. Lovino, Omar V. Müller, Ernesto H. Berbery, Gabriela V. Müller,