| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8936989 | British Journal of Anaesthesia | 2009 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
We found no difference in leak pressures and success rate of first-time insertion between the i-gel and the LMA-U. Time to successful insertion was significantly shorter for the i-gel. We conclude that the i-gel provides a reasonable alternative to the LMA-U for controlled ventilation during anaesthesia.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Authors
V. Uppal, S. Gangaiah, G. Fletcher, J. Kinsella,