| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8945443 | The Journal of Arthroplasty | 2018 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
The CJR model holds great promise. However, it incentivizes hospitals to choose lower-cost implants and adopt newer technology more slowly, which could potentially increase revision rates and offset benefits of the program. Policy makers should monitor revision rates and consider changes to the CJR model to ensure beneficiary access to valuable technology.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Lane PhD, Chaoling PhD, Fang PhD, Jennifer T. MPP,