| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8947819 | Journal of Environmental Psychology | 2018 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
- We argue that some of ART's theoretical notions are vague (e.g., soft fascination), and lack a clear operationalization.
- ART research has failed to adequately test ART's main predictions, e.g., that nature effects are recovery effects.
- There is currently little support for ART's assumption that restoration derives from an evolved adaptive response.
- We discuss four outstanding questions for ART, and make several methodological suggestions.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Applied Psychology
Authors
Yannick Joye, Siegfried Dewitte,